USA Flag

Official website of the Department of Homeland Security

Transportation Security Administration

Helping Wounded Warriors

Archived Content

Please note that older content is archived for public record. This page may contain information that is outdated and may not reflect current policy or programs.

If you have questions about policies or procedures, please contact the TSA Contact Center.

Members of the news media may contact TSA Public Affairs.

Monday, March 22, 2010
wounded warrior

Last week, I went to Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC with staff from TSA’s Office of Security Operations who work on screening procedures and officer training. Prosthetics have come a long way, and Walter Reed is on the forefront of providing severely wounded service men and women with state of the art prosthetics and first class treatment and rehabilitation protocols.

As we’ve said before, about a quarter of TSA’s frontline workforce are veterans. We know that our troops deserve respect when they come through the checkpoints, and we do our best to give them the honor they deserve. We work with the Wounded Warrior Project to help severely injured veterans who have been injured with assistance to get them through the checkpoint smoothly. But sadly, we also know that some have tried to exploit our respect for those in the armed forces by impersonating them and trying to sneak bad things through. Unfortunate, but true.

As you can imagine, soldiers with shrapnel in their bodies and prosthetic limbs set off metal detectors. As part of the hospital visit, the security team looked at various prosthetics and their inner workings to better understand how to write procedures for screening people with them. We also visited and spoke with some wounded soldiers about the Wounded Warrior Project, and gave them tips to make their checkpoint experience less stressful. We also talked to them and their family members about advanced imaging technology, which reduces the chance of a pat down for people with metal implants and prosthetics.

To facilitate the movement of injured veterans, TSA partners with the Department of Defense and the Wounded Warrior Project through the TSA Military Severely Injured Program. To request assistance through this program, injured service members or their designee(s) should contact TSA by telephone, email, or fax no later than 24 hours prior to flying. This will allow enough time for the TSA Military Severely Injured program to contact local TSA officials at the departing airport who will facilitate the injured service member's screening experience.

We look forward to continuing our work with the Department of Defense to identify protocols that improve how we screen people with disabilities.

Lynn
TSA Blog Team

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous on

I think screeners better understanding prosthetics and possibly seeing how to improve screening those that have them is a good thing.

However, I have a question about the statement in the post where you met with wounded soldiers and "gave them tips to make their checkpoint experience less stressful" --

Did you also allow them an opportunity to give feedback on problems they've experienced with screenings and educate you on how you should treat them in facilitating the screening process, which would also make their checkpoint experience "less stressful"?

Submitted by Chris Boyce on
We work with the Wounded Warrior Project to help severely injured veterans who have been injured with assistance to get them through the checkpoint smoothly.

Interesting -- Every other federal agency also participates in the Wounded Warrior Program with one significant difference: They actually hire wounded warriors.

We also talked to them and their family members about advanced imaging technology, which reduces the chance of a pat down for people with metal implants and prosthetics.

I trust the GIs saw right through your limp attempt to sell strip search machines to them if they ever fly again.

Does this mean you are also going to visit a hospital to study patients with insulin pumps, restorative breast surgery, colostomy bags, etc, and convince those patients that the strip search machines aren't so bad?

But sadly, we also know that some have tried to exploit our respect for those in the armed forces by impersonating them and trying to sneak bad things through.

Funny -- I don't remember reading anything about this in the paper or online. If this really happened, the "Big Catch" would be plastered all over the TSA web site and here in the blog.

This is even beyond a Puppy Post.
Submitted by Anonymous on

So removing artificial limbs from amputees isn't enough? Why not just swab the limb down for explosive trace residue and be done with it? Since all you're authorized to search for is explosives, weapons, and incendiary devices.

Submitted by Anonymous on

While it's good that there's a mechanism to minimize the chance that your poorly-trained, unprofessional screeners will abuse severely wounded vets, shouldn't the same courtesy be extended to all severely wounded and handicapped individuals?

Submitted by Sandra on

What's wrong, Lynn? TSA's claims that WBI is being accepted are not true so now you have to go to Walter Reed to promote your cause.

"But sadly, we also know that some have tried to exploit our respect for those in the armed forces by impersonating them and trying to sneak bad things through. Unfortunate, but true."

True? Then why has not TSA touted the finding of these alleged "bad things" by impersonators? Guess what, Lynn, your veracity is highly questionable.

Know what happened in Idaho today? Their House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to restrict use of WBI at Idaho airports.

This could be the start of something big.

Submitted by Anonymous on

It is very nice you are doing this for wounded active duty service members but don't you see any problem with the double standard if you don't offer the same service to the general public?

Submitted by Anonymous on

While we all appreciate their service, why are disabled veterans given any more respect than any other disabled American who attempts to traverse a TSA checkpoint?

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Lynn, it is nice to see a blog post explaining that we are continuing to reach out to external sources to help our screening process! I especially love that we are working with the Vets to streamline the process for them. It is nice to see HQ reaching out consistently to improve the process for all passengers with disabilities. I would like to thank the Wounded Warrior Project, and the wonderful programs and assistance they render to our Vets. Excellent post!

West
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by Ayn R Key on

Oh Bob.... oh dear.

Please stick to topic.

Submitted by Anonymous on

Great work. It would, of course, have been absolutely impossible to have, oh I don't know, thought some of these things through years ago: as we all know, there were no amputees and absolutely no knowledge of prosthetics before the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. Luckily, this timing has allowed the TSA to puff up what should be their job (i.e. designing and implementing effective, efficient security procedures) by linking it to wounded veterans (who, as all good citizens of the republic know, are nothing short of angels walking among us, demi-gods superior to those of us who just don't have the guts to join up and ship out to whatever country we're invading this week) and slapping a ridiculous name on it.

Submitted by Sandra on

Anonymous wrote:

"It would, of course, have been absolutely impossible to have, oh I don't know, thought some of these things through years ago: as we all know, there were no amputees and absolutely no knowledge of prosthetics before the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan."

+1

Submitted by LTSO With Answers on
So removing artificial limbs from amputees isn't enough? Why not just swab the limb down for explosive trace residue and be done with it? Since all you're authorized to search for is explosives, weapons, and incendiary devices.

We do not ask passengers to remove artificial limbs as part of the normal screening process. We do swab prostectic devices for explosives.
Submitted by LTSO With Answers on
While it's good that there's a mechanism to minimize the chance that your poorly-trained, unprofessional screeners will abuse severely wounded vets, shouldn't the same courtesy be extended to all severely wounded and handicapped individuals?

We recieve training for all sorts of persons with disabilities. Hidden or obvious we have ways to help them through the screening processes. Some people see us abusing someone handicapped just because we are screening them but this is not so. Everyone is subject to screening. Even the elderly.
Submitted by Ayn R Key on

By the way, Bob, when I say "stick to topic" I mean "don't insult our intelligence with a puppy post when there are very relevant and revealing questions still unanswered from your last post."

Submitted by Anonymous on

So does this mean that TSOs will no longer be telling young crippled children to remove their braces and walk through your scanning systems, or wheelchair-bound elderly gentlemen to get out of their chair and walk?

It's nice to see that your agency is beginning to see the impracticality of having your agents "play God" and try to "heal" people to get them to walk through your Porn-O-Scopes.

And while you're out trying to make the checkpoint a "kinder, gentler" place, would you also re-educate your agents on the questions they are and aren't allowed to ask when encountering someone with a medical condition? The last I checked they weren't allowed to ask details of medical conditions, as that violates privacy laws and is certainly out of the bounds of your agency's mandate to look for guns, knives, and explosives.

Thanks.

Submitted by Gunner on

I was expecting this puppy post on Friday. I wish you would stick to your schedule.

Submitted by Isaac Newton on

Lynn wrote:
As part of the hospital visit, the security team looked at various prosthetics and their inner workings to better understand how to write procedures for screening people with them.
Do you really need to understand how a prosthetic works to know that it's going to set off the metal detector and that the screening process will be a patdown or the WBI? Sheesh, I could've told you that, but then you wouldn't have this heart-warming story.

Watching a TSA screener groping a disabled person, veteran or not, is a disturbing sight. I agree that this is just an excuse to encourage the injured veterans to use the WBI, to make TSA look less foolish.

Submitted by Jack on

"soldiers with shrapnel in their bodies and prosthetic limbs set off metal detectors. As part of the hospital visit, the security team looked at various prosthetics and their inner workings to better understand how to write procedures for screening people with them. We also visited and spoke with some wounded soldiers about the Wounded Warrior Project."
It's good project

Submitted by Anonymous on

Quoted:
Anonymous said...
While we all appreciate their service, why are disabled veterans given any more respect than any other disabled American who attempts to traverse a TSA checkpoint?

March 22, 2010 6:23 PM"
------------------------
Uh, because they deserve it.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"To request assistance through this program, injured service members or their designee(s) should contact TSA by telephone, email, or fax no later than 24 hours prior to flying. This will allow enough time for the TSA Military Severely Injured program to contact local TSA officials at the departing airport who will facilitate the injured service member's screening experience."
--------------------------------

What if my leg was amputated as the result of, say, a logging accident? Can you explain why these measures have only been instituted for veterans? Are the rest of us second-class citizens?

Submitted by Rock on

You know what would also help people get through the checkpoint smoothly? Not having their naked scanner pictures taken, as we all know the tsa employees will do, and which other scanner employees have started to do:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/24/airport-worker-warned-body-scanner

And before you say "this happened in the UK not here" it just proves that it CAN happen here - which means it will.

Submitted by 8675309 on

"Funny -- I don't remember reading anything about this in the paper or online. If this really happened, the "Big Catch" would be plastered all over the TSA web site and here in the blog."

Actually I've read many things in mainstream media about prohibited weapons and drugs being found in prosthetics and mobility aids by TSA. But of course even if you saw the article yourself, you would claim it was made up.

"Interesting -- Every other federal agency also participates in the Wounded Warrior Program with one significant difference: They actually hire wounded warriors."

Read the first sentence of this web page:

http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/careers/gc_1257434968190.shtm

As a component of DHS, TSA does hire wounded warriors. But of course even though you can read it, you will claim that it isn't true.

"What's wrong, Lynn? TSA's claims that WBI is being accepted are not true so now you have to go to Walter Reed to promote your cause."

I would rather go through WBI than have a stranger run their hands all over me. Remember, not everybody is as paranoid as you are, maybe you should let the vets decide for themselves if they want the WBI before trying to run to their rescue. Having faced the dangers of roadside bombs, and having survived being shot or shot at, I'm sincerely doubt that they care about a miniscule amount of radiation or are worried that somebody might see a black-and-white image that looks more like the Michelin man than it looks like porn. But I'll let the vets decide for themselves because going through the WBI is optional.

"Know what happened in Idaho today? Their House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to restrict use of WBI at Idaho airports."

Maybe they like members of the same sex rubbing them down during pat downs. What happens in Idaho stays in Idaho? Since the WBI is optional anyway, what purpose does limiting the WBI serve except to take options away from us who don't want to be patted down?

"While we all appreciate their service, why are disabled veterans given any more respect than any other disabled American who attempts to traverse a TSA checkpoint?"

The Wounded Warrior project isn't a TSA program. What non-TSA program/project are you suggesting that TSA reach out to? Have they reached out to TSA like Wounded Warrior did?

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Anon sez - "While it's good that there's a mechanism to minimize the chance that your poorly-trained, unprofessional screeners will abuse severely wounded vets, shouldn't the same courtesy be extended to all severely wounded and handicapped individuals?"

Any time we communicate with any group of persons that require special assistance, more coordination, or any type of understanding, it can only help us with ALL people that have the same types of needs. By working with the Vets to learn what steps are the easiest for them, what type of communication they need, and what types of accomodations are needed - it just helps us to screen other people with the same needs better as a workforce.

What is learned will be put into training, communicated to the workforce, and in this case given to the public so they can see it as well. I wish we had the chance to do more of this type of cooperation with groups.

I think this is a great chance for HQ (and by extension the whole workforce)to learn what effects screening can have on people with disabilities.

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Anon sez - "It is very nice you are doing this for wounded active duty service members but don't you see any problem with the double standard if you don't offer the same service to the general public?"

By learning more from the Vets, we can assist other people with similar needs better. I think one of the simpler reasons they worked with Walter Reed is the location and the amount of varying wounds and injuries seen there. All passengers with disabilities or special needs benefit by HQ commnunicating with the Vets and learning best practices and procedures to help them.

West
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Ayn sez - "Oh Bob.... oh dear.

Please stick to topic."

This post was by Lynn, and it is an excellent topic. It lets folks know how the agency is working on learning how to deal more effectively and professionally with folks that have disabilities and special needs. It also gives a source to Vets that may make it easier on them arranging travel. How is that off topic?

West
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Anon sez - "Great work. It would, of course, have been absolutely impossible to have, oh I don't know, thought some of these things through years ago: as we all know, there were no amputees and absolutely no knowledge of prosthetics before the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. Luckily, this timing has allowed the TSA to puff up what should be their job (i.e. designing and implementing effective, efficient security procedures) by linking it to wounded veterans (who, as all good citizens of the republic know, are nothing short of angels walking among us, demi-gods superior to those of us who just don't have the guts to join up and ship out to whatever country we're invading this week) and slapping a ridiculous name on it."

Hiya Anon, I have a few things to say to you on this particular issue:

1) This is part of an ongoing learning procedure. When TSA first came into being, they coordinated with over 50 (I think it is closer to 70, but I don't want to misquote) recognized groups to design and implement procedures that helped people with disabilties. These procedures have changed numerous times, and this post is simply the most recent in those ongoing efforts to learn.

2)People have had disabilities since long before any of us were here. To imply that there has only been a focus on these folks since the war in Iraq and Afghanistan is simply silly.

3) We have been designing these security programs and updating, changing and refining them since day one. Some are better programs than others, but it is never a "create this and then we are done process".

4) Most military members are not Angels or Demigods, they are folks that took an Oath, served their country, and in some instances have injuries that have forever changed them. Not all of these injuries are physical, but we were coordinating with Walter Reed to find ways to work better with folks that have ALL sorts of disabilities (this group just happened to be Vets).

5) Thankfully, this country does not require you to serve in the military. It is an all volunteer force and those that choose not to go are not necessarily cowardly or even not brave. It simply means they chose not to go into the military for their own reasons. If you are applying cowardice to not entering service, that is your own impression or interpretation, and a fairly narrow viewpoint (it is also sad).

6) The Wounded Warrior Project is a fantastic non profit organization that assists military members that are wounded. It was started by a group of folks that thought something should be done to help those coming back wounded. They help thousands of military members and their families to get financial, legal, educational, rehabilitational and other forms of assistance - simply because they want to.

On a personal note, I love what the Wounded Warrior Project does, and think that as a Nation, we should be participating in more groups like them.

West
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Sandra sez "+1"

You are indicating +1 to the fact that someone (erroneously) tried to point out that the agency has never worked with peresons with disabilties before they worked with the Vets at Walter Reed? That is pretty sad, we have worked with several groups on developing ways to work with folks that have disabilities and to learn the best way to help them. We then post a followup coordination with Walter Reed as part of an ongoing learning process so we can keep up with new technology that helps folks with disabilties, and how to effectively screen them. And you give a +1 to someone that made a fairly hardhearted statement? WTG, you win a gold star for your notebook! Next please?

West
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by Barbara on

While some may think working with the Wounded Warrior Program is merely a step in the right direction, it is, indeed, just that --- a step. Let's get real here, folks. Maintaining the safety of travel and travelers is a DAUNTING responsibility, and a thankless one at that. We are sure to hear about the "ones that got through" but we are far less likely to pay attention to the countless times things have worked. Moreover, when the safety of all is concerned, we do not need, nor do we have the right to expect to know. If every case is detailed ad infinitum, further information is supplied which may be used to circumnavigate the System.

As for speaking with the Wounded Warriors, again, a great place to start. Walter Reed houses a finite community which represents a larger population of those with physical challenges. As the parent of a US Marine who is now serving in Afghanistan, I would dare say that the average service member would laugh at the slight inconveniences they may meet while going through a security checkpoint! You see, they are accustomed to real-life security issues on a daily basis, and know that "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!" You cannot be selfless and selfish at the same time; if we want our country to be safe, we may have to suppress our own comfort and privacy. You can't always have it both ways.

Finally, TSA is a government agency. Everything they do must be approved by a bureaucracy of government checks and balances. Have you ever tried to start a group from the ground up and answer to committees and subcommittee each step of the way? It's a challenge to say the least. Try doing that on a national level. Furthermore, the challenge ANY group or corporation faces is that it is comprised of people. NONE of those people is perfect, nor is any agency, government or otherwise. As Americans, though, we have the right to tweak our checks and balances. We can call our representatives, we can voice our concerns, we can vote freely. We must, however, use these responsibilities cautiously and question whether we are working toward a common good or augmenting our own self-serving desires. It seems that TSA is trying to be part of the solution, but it is incumbent upon us to not become part of the problem!

Submitted by Ayn R Key on

West wrote:
This post was by Lynn, and it is an excellent topic.

And Bob approved it to distract us from the previous topic.

Submitted by Anonymous on

Hey, Barbara, how much were you paid to write that?

Submitted by Chris Boyce on

Anonymous 8675309 irrationally lashed out and said...

Actually I've read many things in mainstream media about prohibited weapons and drugs being found in prosthetics and mobility aids by TSA. But of course even if you saw the article yourself, you would claim it was made up.

Hey, pal, please bring us up to speed and cite some sources. While you're at it, please tell us why finding drugs is a TSA mission.

...and, if that wasn't enough, he said:

Read the first sentence of this web page:

http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/careers/gc_1257434968190.shtm

Please tell us how many wounded warriors the DHS has actually hired -- in real numbers and as a percentage of the overall workforce. You'd better be right -- I have the actual data.

Submitted by Anonymous on
LTSO with Answers said...

We do not ask passengers to remove artificial limbs as part of the normal screening process. We do swab prostectic devices for explosives.

March 23, 2010 12:11 PM
___________________________________

That's an awful big blanket statement to make, and again, is evidence of the inherent problems with the TSA.

Over and over again, travelers say you do.

Here's one of many: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20100308_Daniel_Rubin__More_stor...

At Baltimore-Washington International, he watched trainees force a Gulf War veteran passing through the detectors to remove his prosthetic limbs.

"To do this, the war hero had to sit on the floor of the checkpoint. . . . The screener and supervisor involved saw nothing wrong with this process."

A quick scan will pull up many more.
Submitted by Ranger11 on

Very Well said Barbara. As a former active duty service member, I praise your resolve and offer my prayers for your soldier and his safe return home. I too, still, have many friends that continue to serve, and many others that have traversed the halls of Walter Reed and come out the other side as better soldiers and men.

Once again, very well said.

Submitted by Anonymous on

So what is this I hear about a TSA employee accused of harassing another using the body scanner on her and making lewd comments? Are these machines really so innocuous after all, hmmmmmm? Will the TSA tell this employee that her complaints have no merit since her image was not stored or printed?

Submitted by Anonymous on

GSOLTSO--

Please provide a link to the website where severely injured civilians can apply for special treatment at TSA checkpoints. If you can't do that, kindly refrain from suggesting that this post was really about ongoing efforts to help all disabled people rather than an advertisement for a program specifically designed to provide assistance to veterans that is not available to civilians. There's nothing inherently wrong in that if you happen to believe that, when making decisions about exactly how much "respect," "honor," and access to special accommodations will be afforded to a given individual, our society ought to strike such a distinction between those who have "served" and those who merely "work." Please understand that many of us want to preserve the society that you have described in "point 5": ["5) Thankfully, this country does not require you to serve in the military. It is an all volunteer force and those that choose not to go are not necessarily cowardly or even not brave. It simply means they chose not to go into the military for their own reasons."]

The post was all about trumpeting the special steps that TSA is taking to help veterans, with only a passing reference to the applicability of these programs to the disabled community as a whole. Stop acting like we should all know about TSAs alleged commitment to civilian community outreach. I'm not saying this doesn't happen, but I would think we'd be reading blog posts about it if the TSA were to, oh say, establish programs at retirement communities in order to both educate the elderly population and refine procedures. Again, maybe you're doing this stuff all the time, but you shouldn't imply that we should know about it from this post, this blog, or this agency. Aren't you the folks who took several years to figure out that people might need a place to sit to get their shoes back on?

Submitted by GSOLTSO on

Anon sez - "What if my leg was amputated as the result of, say, a logging accident? Can you explain why these measures have only been instituted for veterans? Are the rest of us second-class citizens?"

Anything we can learn from these collaborations are applied and taught for ALL persons with disabilities. If (God forbid!) you were to have a leg amputated, I would help you and work with you just like any other passenger with a disability. I do not think you are a second class citizen at all!

West
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by Anonymous on

Bob, you should have had second, and if necessary, third thoughts about posting TSA working with the Wounded Warrior Project. It would have been much better received if it had come out from the military members involved with it. As it sits right now it looks like just another rah rah look at us post.

Submitted by Kellymae81 on

Chris Boyce said: Interesting -- Every other federal agency also participates in the Wounded Warrior Program with one significant difference: They actually hire wounded warriors.

Who said TSA doesnt hire wounded warriors? Is that what you are saying with that statement? TSA does not discriminate. From what I understand, just like any other company/agency, there are requirements to be hired on. TSOs have to pass several tests along with the requirement of being able to lift 70 lbs. If you cannot, then no, you probably wont be hired. It doesnt mean you are being discriminated against. When looking for jobs lets say via the internet, they always list the requirements. If I don't meet those requirements, I probably wont get the job.
So to sum up, if a wounded warrior applies for TSA and can pass these tests and lift 70 lbs, then he will be hired.

Submitted by Anonymous on

Why TSA is having PR issues.
.........................
Non-TSA employee posted on another blog:

"Many of the post you have made over the past months seems to indicate, at least to me, that you have a very poor opinion of the people you serve.

Do you think that moves the ball forward on how the public views TSA as a whole?"

Response from TSA employee:

"Lets be honest, would it really matter? You hate us and we return it to you. It wont ever change."

Submitted by Blogger Bob on

Anonymous said... So what is this I hear about a TSA employee accused of harassing another using the body scanner on her and making lewd comments? Are these machines really so innocuous after all, hmmmmmm? Will the TSA tell this employee that her complaints have no merit since her image was not stored or printed? March 26, 2010 11:40 AM
-----------------------

It wasn't TSA. This unfortunate incident occurred in the UK. TSA does not screen in the UK.

Thanks,

Blogger Bob
TSA Blog Team

Submitted by RB on

Blogger Bob said...
Anonymous said... So what is this I hear about a TSA employee accused of harassing another using the body scanner on her and making lewd comments? Are these machines really so innocuous after all, hmmmmmm? Will the TSA tell this employee that her complaints have no merit since her image was not stored or printed? March 26, 2010 11:40 AM
-----------------------

It wasn't TSA. This unfortunate incident occurred in the UK. TSA does not screen in the UK.

Thanks,

Blogger Bob
TSA Blog Team

March 29, 2010 10:12 AM
...............
Not the US but apparently these Strip Search Machines do reveal sufficent detail that a person in the UK got his jollies by looking at a co-worker.

Is this why TSA refuses to release WBI images in the same size and resolution that the machine operator sees?

What is TSA hiding?

How can I as a traveler made a decision to either accept WBI or not if I don't have all the correct information needed to make an informed decision?

Until TSA releases this information I would suggest that everyone say NO to Strip Search Machines.

Nico said the images are safe for young children to view. Are they really safe for young children to view?

Was Nico also not properly informed like the Chicago FSD?

How about some truth TSA!

Submitted by Anonymous on

Why was my post deleted? I am asking a perfectly legitimate question: What does whole body imaging help with screening persons with prosthetics? These machines can only see the surface, and you could hide large prohibited weapons and explosives in a fake limb.

You should be using explosives detection technology, not imaging.

Submitted by James on

Its the best service to humanity taking care of the wounded All diabled should be given good care

Submitted by Stephanie on

I think this effort is great...and needed. I have worked for several years as a rehab nurse and have told patients with joint replacements over and over again to plan ahead for airport travel.

We use to provide patients written documentation from the physician attesting to their surgery, as well as specific locations of the hardware. I can only imagine using such efforts with soldiers would require a much more secure process.

Submitted by Micheal on

advanced imaging technology is defiantly a less embarrassing way of screening people,possibly the way forward for all hospitals

Submitted by Anonymous on

Jack, you didn't even really read the post, did you?

You just copied and pasted some of the article.

And you got a link for your HDTV sales onto the blog.

Good work!

Submitted by James on

I applaud the effort to treat wounded veterns with respect and at the same time explore ways to keep the public safe. Things and people are not always as they seem and it takes effort to find ways to keep the public safe and not cause the innocent to be subjected to procedures that are not respectful.

Submitted by Anonymous on

GSOLTSO said...
Anon sez - "What if my leg was amputated as the result of, say, a logging accident? Can you explain why these measures have only been instituted for veterans? Are the rest of us second-class citizens?"

Anything we can learn from these collaborations are applied and taught for ALL persons with disabilities. If (God forbid!) you were to have a leg amputated, I would help you and work with you just like any other passenger with a disability. I do not think you are a second class citizen at all!

West
TSA Blog Team

--------------------------------

Great. Please provide me the link where a severely injured civilian can apply for special assistance. You have provided the link for veterans, so it shouldn't be a problem for you to demonstrate the existence of a parallel program for civilians.

Submitted by Jim Huggins on

Great ... six new posts approved today, and four of them have links to external commercial websites ...

Pages