USA Flag

Official website of the Department of Homeland Security

Transportation Security Administration

TSA Week in Review: BB Gun in a Book

Archived Content

Please note that older content is archived for public record. This page may contain information that is outdated and may not reflect current policy or programs.

If you have questions about policies or procedures, please contact the TSA Contact Center.

Members of the news media may contact TSA Public Affairs.

Friday, August 24, 2012
BB Gun in a Book – While we regularly find BB and pellet guns, I don’t usually write about them, but this one was kind of interesting. Why? Well, first off, it has the appearance of a real firearm, and it was taped inside of a book! The book wasn’t hollowed out mind you, it was just taped there. This was discovered at Fargo (FAR). Realistic replica firearms are prohibited for the same reason that inert grenades are. They not only cause the checkpoint to come to a halt when we find them, but imagine if...

BB Gun in a Book - While we regularly find BB and pellet guns, I don’t usually write about them, but this one was kind of interesting. Why? Well, first off, it has the appearance of a real firearm, and it was taped inside of a book! The book wasn’t hollowed out mind you, it was just taped there. This was discovered at Fargo (FAR). Realistic replica firearms are prohibited for the same reason that inert grenades are. They not only cause the checkpoint to come to a halt when we find them, but imagine if somebody waved one of these items around on a plane. There are many scenarios of what could happen, and not one of them is good.

Oops, I Forgot There Was a Pistol in My Pocket: A passenger traveling out of Oklahoma City (OKC) was removing items from his pocket prior to walking through a body scanner when he realized he had an unloaded .22 pistol in his pocket.

Knives & Cane Sword

Items in the Strangest Places - It’s one thing to forget you had a prohibited item in your bag, but when you intentionally try to sneak it past us, you could be cited or even arrested by law enforcement. Here are a few examples from this week where passengers tried to sneak items past our Officers.

  • Two knives were detected concealed between a metal sheet and the nylon sleeve of the bag frame at Seattle (SEA).
  • A multi-tool was discovered concealed in a sock that was filled with change at Tucson (TUS).
  • A knife was detected concealed under the lining attached to the pull handle of a bag at Harrisburg (MDT).
  • A belt buckle knife was discovered at Salt Lake City (SLC).
  • A pocket knife (a pink one!) was attached to the back of a key with a rubber band in an attempt to conceal it at Wilmington (ILM).
  • See “BB Gun in Book” above to read about the find in Fargo (FAR).

People Say the Darndest Things - Here is an example of what not to say at the airport. Statements like these not only delay the people who said them but can also inconvenience lots of other passengers if the checkpoint or terminal has to be evacuated:

  • A passenger at Honolulu (HNL) told the ticket agent that he had a bomb in his bag. When the ticket agent reprimanded him for the comment, he told the gate agent that he had a nuclear bomb in his bag. Law enforcement officers responded and arrested him on a state charge.
  • While an Officer was conducting an explosive trace sample at Orlando (MCO), the passenger stated: “I hope the residue doesn’t show up on the test.”
  • A passenger at Charlottesville (CHO) stated he had a bomb in his shoe after he was asked to place his shoes on the x-ray belt.
Grenade

Inert Grenades Etc. - We continue to find hand grenades and other weaponry on weekly basis. Please keep in mind that if something looks like a bomb, grenade, mine, etc., it is prohibited - real or not. When these items are found at a checkpoint, they can cause significant delays to you and other passengers. I know they are cool novelty items, but again, please do not take them on planes! Read here and here on why inert items cause problems.

  • An inert grenade was discovered in the carry-on bag of a passenger at Indianapolis (IND).

Stun Guns - Zzzzzzap! 6 stun guns were discovered in carry-on bags at checkpoints around the nation: 2 at Denver (DEN), Atlanta (ATL), Tucson (TUS), Los Angeles (LAX), and Kansas City (MCI)

Throwing Stars

Miscellaneous Prohibited Items - In addition to all of the other prohibited items we find weekly, our Officers also regularly find firearm components, realistic replica firearms, brass knuckles, ammunition, batons, and a lot of sharp pointy things. Just to mention a few...

Firearms - Here are the firearms our Officers found in carry-on baggage since I posted last Friday.

Loaded guns
Loaded guns
Loaded guns
Loaded guns
28 guns discovered at TSA checkpoints.

You can travel with your firearms in checked baggage, but they must first be declared to the airline. You can go here for more details on how to properly travel with your firearms. Firearm possession laws vary by state and locality. Travelers should familiarize themselves with state and local firearm laws for each point of travel prior to departure.

Bob Burns
TSA Blog Team

If you have a travel related issue or question that needs an immediate answer, you can contact us by clicking here.

Comments

Submitted by CJ on

A BB Gun?! He could have killed half the flying public with that weapon of mass destruction. Glad you guys were there to stop this terror before we had another 9/11! That guy could have poked someone's eye out!! God bless the TSA. Every one!

Submitted by Anonymous on

Anyone with an ounce of brains would realize the similarity to a real pistol that could be used to force entrance to the cockpit. Once there, who's going to challenge the authenticity of the weapon held to the Flight Attendant's head. As a pilot, I say good job TSA.

Submitted by Ben Hurt on

CJ makes what I consider a very immature sarcastic remark about the BB gun. True, it may not hurt anyone seriously (but you might ask my cousin who lost a front tooth to one if he agrees)but it could cause a mass panic, and dozens of people have died from being trampled, and BB gun shooters have been killed by police who didn't have the time to ask what it was. I rarely have much to say in praise of TSA but this time they acted properly. My gripe with them has been a lack of communication, such as not posting a full list of things that cannot be taken on board. Last year it cost us $25 because my daughter bought a snow globe, and then when I returned from a builder's conference with free nails, I found myself having to give those up and submit to additional searches.

Submitted by Anonymous on

CJ, although the BB Gun itself could not cause much damage, imagine the chaos and fear it could cause if someone pulled it out and started waving it around. Most people will not be able to distinguish a BB gun from a serious weapon. As usual, it is the gun owner we need to be concerned with before the gun itself. It was very unwise to conceal the gun and attempt to bring it onto the plane. No good could come from it. It is not going to work as protection if that is what they were thinking. Just plain bad judgement.

Submitted by Anonymous on

in Georgia, if you wave a bb gun, toy plastic gun, airsoft gun, or even a chocolate gun and it looks real....your perceived "threat" real or not, gets "stopped", justifiably.

Submitted by Ginny on

Didn't you read the first paragraph? I believe these agents are much maligned & underappreciated. Have you forgotten 9/11? Blame the terrorists, not the TSA. They're trying to save your life.

Submitted by Anonymous on

Come on CJ, these folks have a job to do. There are a probably 100 scenario’s where a BB gun could cause something to escalate and cause real harm. Given the questionable intelligence of the person trying to carry this on, I could see it getting dropped and spotted by a L.E.O. Even though the holder might be saying its safe, its just a BB gun, but in the interim the L.E.O could responded with deadly force. An air marshal, similar reaction. I recall several cases over the years where a child has been shot holding a BB gun by a L.E.O. Now take a security sensitive location like an airport. Of course there are other examples, perhaps an elderly person on an aircraft having an adverse reaction.

There is a reason why certain replica's, look a likes, etc. are prohibited.

Submitted by Anonymous on

So did you stop any terrorists this week?

Or did you just catch people who had forgotten about items, were trying to smuggle contraband, and made poor decisions with their first amendment rights?

Submitted by Anonymous on

CJ, haven't you seen National Lampoon's Vacation? With a BB gun, you can break the skin and cause an infection! lol

Submitted by Anonymous on

Annonymous said .... So did you stop any terrorists this week?

I can ask, did any planes crash into buildings killing thousands?

How would you know if you did or didn't stop anyone?

The latest is using "Toy" RC vehicles/planes to deliver explosives. Of course to you it is just a toy plane.

Perhaps you should just wake up and open your eyes.

Mike

Submitted by Anonymous on

".......So did you stop any terrorists this week? Or did you just catch people who ..... were trying to smuggle contraband......"

Doubt that those who lost loved ones in 11/7 would add you to their Christmas list.

Submitted by Anonymous on

So what are those body scanners good for again?

Submitted by Sandra on

Really, Bob, your "friend" needs to get his or her act together when posting favorable responses to one of your threads. (Or do you have several "friends" in adjoining cubicles responding?)

It's so obvious - 4 comments in a row.

screen shot64 id

Submitted by Anonymous on

It was a poor choice trying to hide the BB gun in a hollowed out book. I don't want guns on a plane, but in reality someone with a gun isn't going to cause another 9/11 style attack. The person with the gun may be able to damage the plane enough so that it crashes with enough precisely placed shots. More likely the person with the gun may kill a few passengers before being subdued, but that has been happening on the ground lately. The pilots aren't going to open the cockpit door just because someone has a gun. It would still be a tragedy, but not the scale of 9/11.

Looking at the knives that were found is kind of humorous. That one that is attached to the keys is a joke. What is someone going to do with that? I've seen more dnagerous pairs of scissors (a permitted item) or knives in first class.

Submitted by Anonymous on

I saw an article this week about the TSA testing 4 different shoe scanners that would allow passengers to keep their shoes on. They didn't meet the TSA's standards so we will keep having to take off our shoes.

Why do we have to take off our shoes at all? Almost every other country (including Europe) doesn't require shoe removal. Their flights are as safe as ours. The shoe bomber's flight originated from Paris and not the US. Why is the TSA still requiring shoe removal when everywhere else doesn't?

Submitted by Anonymous on

What a discrace. The TSA should perform the hearings required by law and court order and stop terrorizing the American public.

Submitted by Anonymous on

The dangerous people in this world of ours are those who think they are above the law, smarter than others, ungrateful for agencies that try their best to protect them from harm. Sad we have to suffer such fools while the rest of us remember in sorrow lives lost, tragedies averted, how fragile and close we are each day to another attack upon our blessed freedom.

Submitted by Anonymous on

You left out a TSA achievement worth crowing about. The TSA deftly disposed of the Boston racial profiling fiasco by making BDOs spend four hours in special training. That, of course, intentionally fails to address the problem that led to the racial profiling. But it successfully reacts to the embarrassing disclosure while avoiding even the suggestion that anyone in the TSA did anything wrong! The sheer brilliance of this evasive maneuver can only confirm reports that Secretary Napolitano and Administrator Pistole were personally involved in crafting this response.

Despite the success of this response (or should I say "non-response"), it does send a very worrisome message.

It's clear that the BDOs whose wrists are being slapped did not decide on their own to conduct racial profiling. Someone in the TSA bureaucracy decided that BDOs needed to produce more "referrals" to law enforcement. We'll never know who that official was, or why they needed more "referrals." But it's most likely that they wanted impressive "numbers" to neutralize critics of the BDO program, and/or to justify expansion of the program.

We'll also never know exactly what the supervisors in Boston did in response to that request. But in setting the quotas for "referrals," they must have either told the officers to do racial profiling, or made a more oblique suggestion about how to improve their "productivity." Regardless, they issued the orders that led to the racial profiling. And we do know that 32 BDOs found those orders distressing enough to blow the whistle.

There was a chain of officials within the TSO who bear actual responsibility for violating TSA policy about racial profiling. They also acted improperly in setting quotas for "referrals," and in diverting TSA resources from fighting terrorism. But it appears that TSA leadership saw nothing improper about any of it. The only problem was that some disgruntled officers went public and made the TSA look bad. So sending BDOs for retraining was the way to contain the damage, while shielding the real perpetrators from any responsibility and the TSA from any accountability.

The message this posterior-covering non-response sends is that the TSA condones racial profiling and quotas, if it serves the TSA's needs. Anyone is free to violate policies and waste resources, if it advances the TSA's agenda. And officers can subject any passenger to intrusive harassment, and even "referral" to police, merely to fulfill a quota. If, as it often appears, the TSA is intent on earning the enmity and distrust of the traveling public, this response was an excellent way to do that.

This action could cause real problems if, as I've read, the TSA expands the interactions BDOs have with the public. Presumably, BDOs will be looking for people who act uncomfortable when approached, or are less than eager to answer friendly questions about where they're going and why they're traveling. Knowing that the TSA condones racial profiling and self-serving quotas is reason for even an innocent passenger to be apprehensive when an officer approaches them for a friendly chat. While that may lead to lots of false positives that the TSA can count as "successes," creating an increased level of fear and apprehension will surely undermine whatever ability BDOs supposedly have to spot signs of terrorist intent.

But that's a problem for later. For now, it's MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Submitted by Anonymous on

"Doubt that those who lost loved ones in 11/7 would add you to their Christmas list. "

Because being on someone's Christmas list is a perfectly good reason to forfeit God-given Constitutional liberties.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"The latest is using "Toy" RC vehicles/planes to deliver explosives. Of course to you it is just a toy plane. "

And the only way to prevent such a thing is to molest airline passengers.

BTW, the idea of using RC models is about 18 months old.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"There is a reason why certain replica's, look a likes, etc. are prohibited."

Stupidity?

Submitted by Anonymous on

"Didn't you read the first paragraph? I believe these agents are much maligned & underappreciated. Have you forgotten 9/11? Blame the terrorists, not the TSA. They're trying to save your life."

And I'm trying to save your life. Toward that end, I'm going to have to search your house, car and frisk you every time you leave home.

Don't malign me or underappreciate me; I'm only trying to save your life.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"in Georgia, if you wave a bb gun, toy plastic gun, airsoft gun, or even a chocolate gun and it looks real....your perceived "threat" real or not, gets "stopped", justifiably. "

Was the passenger waving his toy gun around? That was left out of the story.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"CJ makes what I consider a very immature sarcastic remark about the BB gun."

I'm sure he's very embarrassed about that!

"True, it may not hurt anyone seriously (but you might ask my cousin who lost a front tooth to one if he agrees)but it could cause a mass panic, and dozens of people have died from being trampled, and BB gun shooters have been killed by police who didn't have the time to ask what it was."

Or maybe we could just ask passengers who were killed by FAMs for acting strangely. No BB gun necessary! I really think anyone carrying knitting needles is suspicious. I might have to take matters in my own hands next time I see knitting needles on an aircraft. People have lost an eye to knitting needles you know!

"I rarely have much to say in praise of TSA..."

And not much now.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"Anyone with an ounce of brains would realize the similarity to a real pistol that could be used to force entrance to the cockpit. Once there, who's going to challenge the authenticity of the weapon held to the Flight Attendant's head. As a pilot, I say good job TSA."

But mostly not an airline pilot. As an airline pilot, a gun to someone's head is no longer going to gain entrance to the cockpit. I'm sure you knew that though.

Submitted by Wintermute on

Anonymous said...
"Anyone with an ounce of brains would realize the similarity to a real pistol that could be used to force entrance to the cockpit. Once there, who's going to challenge the authenticity of the weapon held to the Flight Attendant's head. As a pilot, I say good job TSA."

Anyone with 1/2 ounce of brains knows that the cockpit doors have been hardened, so there is no forcing entrance to the cockpit. If you were a pilot like you claim, you would know this.

Submitted by Wintermute on

Ginny said...
"Didn't you read the first paragraph?"

Irrelevant.

"I believe these agents are much maligned & underappreciated."

Believe what you want. Much maligned, yes, and deservedly so. Under-appreciated? Not so much.

"Have you forgotten 9/11?"

No, I haven't. Remember the 4th Amendment?

"Blame the terrorists, not the TSA."

The terrorist didn't trample on my rights.

"They're trying to save your life."

No, they're not. They are trying to pull a paycheck. If they were trying to save lives, they would dispense with the security theatre and provide real security.

Submitted by Wintermute on

Blogger Bob,

What happens if one refuses a "chat down" by a BDO? Is it policy to perform to punish the passenger with additional screening? Care to comment on this?

Submitted by Anonymous on
I believe these agents are much maligned & underappreciated. Have you forgotten 9/11? Blame the terrorists, not the TSA. They're trying to save your life.

Terrorists seek to harm their enemies by inducing them to waste their resources on "security." They may also seek to destroy the enemy's way of life, for example by eliminating freedom and openness in favor of an authoritarian security state.

Terrorists can't do that all by themselves. They need the enemy's leaders to be terrified so they'll react in ways that inflict the harm.

Terrorism is like SARS (the scary respiratory virus that struck a few years ago) or the 1918 killer flu. The virus itself doesn't kill the patient. Rather, it's the immune system's overzealous attempts to fight the virus that wreaks the fatal destruction.

The terrorists did something horrible 11 years ago. They destroyed two iconic buildings and three airplanes. But they didn't destroy a large chunk of the liberties and rights that make America unique among nations. Our leaders did that. We should never forget 9/11. But neither should we allow our leaders or the unaccountable bureaucracy they created to use 9/11 as justification for their arrogance.

The terrorists didn't turn flying from a symbol of our freedom into a privilege contingent on the satisfying the whims of "officers" running checkpoints where constitutional rights, privacy, and even human dignity are nullified by an arrogant bureaucracy that puts itself above the law. The TSA did that.

It's not the terrorists' fault that citizens who choose to fly must be patted down like convicted felons, irradiated in a virtual strip search, and subject to the arbitrary confiscation of belongings deemed "contraband." Our leaders chose to react to terrorists by creating the TSA, and then allowing it to empower itself to do whatever it wants.

There are many ways to react to terrorism. Some of them minimize the impact terrorists are able to make by (in the words of Bruce Schneier) refusing to be terrorized. Other ways magnify the power of terrorists to damage and disrupt, inflicting lasting harm even in reaction to failed plots. Unfortunately, the TSA is an example of the latter type of reaction.

The TSA, of course, would like us to blame the terrorists for everything we hate about the TSA. But the terrorists didn't write any of the secret rules and procedures that give them authority to strip passengers of their freedom, privacy, and dignity. The TSA did that. TSA officers may well be maligned, but it's only because they work for an agency that seems intent on earning the enmity and distrust of the passengers it claims to protect.
Submitted by Anonymous on

Four days to respond to the court order that you hold public comments on these policies. Any news? Or do you just don't care? I'm betting the latter.

Submitted by Pedro Millet on

Pienso que todos los controles para evitar que pasen a bordo de las aeronaves armas de cualquier calibre u objetos perforo-cortantes son acciones positivas de nuestros agentes del TSA con la finalidad de resguardar nuestra propia seguridad a borde de dichas naves. Debemos de cooperar en todo esto y evitar, incluso que nuestros ninos lleven similaes de plastico, pues ello evitaria confusiones y alarmas innecesarias. Muchas Gracias.P. Millet

Submitted by BTL on

As I read thru several of these comment some are derogatory towards the TSA. Well I don't like the bureaucracy any more than anyone else, but the guys and gals I have dealt with have for the most part been professional and courteous. I travel with Firearms all the time and even I have made at least one “Dumb” mistake. While transitioning from BLI (Bellingham WA) to ATL (Atlanta), I had no checked bags…. And in my stupor I placed 2 malfunctioning magazines in my carry on to take back to GA for warranty replacement at the Glock Factory. Well the agents at the checkpoint did find these. They were courteous and Professional to my stupid act and delayed me for about 10 minutes while a report was generated. I did of course loose the $50 of “parts”. However I also learned that any Firearm part should not be “hand Carried” but placed in “Checked Bags” If I had taken a moment to think about this particular trip I would have FedEx’d the Magazines to myself and not taken them on the flight. Again I credit the Gate agents for being polite professional and courteous to me as the situation was resolved. Needless to say I won’t make that mistake again.

Submitted by Anonymous on
Four days to respond to the court order that you hold public comments on these policies. Any news? Or do you just don't care? I'm betting the latter.

Actually neither. As a Security Agency with unlimited authority to fight the Global War on Terror, they have empowered themselves to be exempt from any law or court order that interferes with their autonomy or authority. They've even empowered themselves to ignore the Constitution when it gets in their way.

If they don't want to comply with the laws requiring notice and comment rulemaking, they won't comply. If they want to ignore a court order to comply, they'll ignore it. There's nothing anyone can do to make them comply with either one. The TSA answers only to itself.
Submitted by Anonymous on

planes equipped with Chaff or Flare's (countermeasure's) yet? still not safe.

Submitted by RB on

Where does TSA derive any authority to conduct interrogations of travelers?

Submitted by @SkyWayManAz on

Anonymous said...
Four days to respond to the court order that you hold public comments on these policies. Any news? Or do you just don't care? I'm betting the latter.

TSA doesn't feel the need to comply with legalalities. Remember when they threatened to make Texas a no fly zone when a law maker tried to make fly and frisk illegal? Their customer service in as many words told me they don't answer to Congress. I didn't feel the person I spoke with was taking me seriously so I said I would write to my Congressman on the issue. Instead their rep said there's nothing they can do for you. I said are you seriously telling me Congress has no oversight of your agency? Mysteriously the line went dead. Given the track record they've had so far I wouldn't hold your breath on them complying with a court order.

Submitted by Anonymous on

Anonymous said...
"Doubt that those who lost loved ones in 11/7 would add you to their Christmas list. "


I had people at 9/11. Survived but they were right in the midst of the towers.

We are in agreement that the TSA and Homeland Security is out of control, and too PC to go after those they should be going after. So....guess your theory is blown.

Submitted by Srfnff on

CJ, hope you find the other oar....soon.

Submitted by Christopher on

Armed robberies have happened with only a toy gun before. It is always better to be safe than sorry. If this had gotten on board and brought out into the open, it would have caused panic and an emergency landing, then the TSA would be ridiculed for letting this go through. Not all citizens are crazy but with society allowing people to be rewarded for not having morals, it is better to display what has been found and stopped.

Submitted by Anonymous on

Didn't see a picture of the nail clippers that the good folks at ICT decided couldn't travel with me last Friday. What's the threat again?

Submitted by Anonymous on

"While transitioning from BLI (Bellingham WA) to ATL (Atlanta), I had no checked bags…. And in my stupor I placed 2 malfunctioning magazines in my carry on to take back to GA for warranty replacement at the Glock Factory. Well the agents at the checkpoint did find these. They were courteous and Professional to my stupid act and delayed me for about 10 minutes while a report was generated. I did of course loose the $50 of “parts”. However I also learned that any Firearm part should not be “hand Carried” but placed in “Checked Bags” If I had taken a moment to think about this particular trip I would have FedEx’d the Magazines to myself and not taken them on the flight. Again I credit the Gate agents for being polite professional and courteous to me as the situation was resolved. Needless to say I won’t make that mistake again."

Wow. Those malfunctioning magazines could have been thrown at someone and left a terrible bruise.

Tell me one more time why being treated "well" for doing something that represented no threat - carrying magazines, malfunctioning or not - is a problem that the TSA should concern itself with?

Should I be happy that the county sheriff that I passed during my morning jog didn't shoot me?

Submitted by Anonymous on

TSA officers are not trained to determine if a magazine is functional or not. The federal law states no parts of a firearm are allowed in carry-on bags. Let me explain this to those who are common sense challeged. Several different passengers could bring on different parts of a handgun and assemble it while in flight. And to all those who commented above about the BB gun....in the last 2 weeks TSA stopped 63 real handguns from getting onto planes in passengers bags. I'm not saying any one of these had plans to hijack a plane, but what if while in flight the passenger with the handgun gets into an altercation with another passenger and decides to pull out the gun and start shooting?? Ever thought about that? You anti-TSA people need to realize their agency was created because of terrorists hijacking several planes and using them to kill thousands of people. Since TSA was created the score is TSA-10(years) Terrorists-0. Yep, a shut out!

Submitted by Anonymous on

To all those posting TSA hating or bashing comments just remember this - you DEMANDED that the government make air travel safer and that another 9/11 type attack NEVER happen again. Since terrorists come in all shapes, sizes, religions, and nationalities (even the US) everyone gets screened so either live with it or rent your own private plane. TSA is a classic case of getting what you wanted and not being happy with the results.

Submitted by Wintermute on

Anonymous said...
"Let me explain this to those who are common sense challeged."

Insults?!

"Since TSA was created the score is TSA-10(years) Terrorists-0. Yep, a shut out!"

Since I got this anti-Monkey rock (15 years) Monkeys-0. Yup. Must be working. See the logical fallacy there? Your statement contains the exact same fallacy.

Submitted by Wintermute on

Anonymous said...
"To all those posting TSA hating or bashing comments just remember this - you DEMANDED that the government make air travel safer and that another 9/11 type attack NEVER happen again."

Where to start? First, no such demands were made by me, so your entire premise is faulty. Second, with an approximate 70% failure rate, the TSA does nothing to make air travel safer. Third, terrorism, like drugs, will always exist because it's not possible to eliminate 100%. Finally, hardening the cockpit doors and changing policy from compliance to resistance is all that was needed to prevent another 9/11.

The rest is a colossal waste of taxpayer money and does NOTHING to enhance security. If anything, the false sense of security it provides to some makes the rest of us that much LESS safe.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"Since I got this anti-Monkey rock (15 years) Monkeys-0. Yup. Must be working. See the logical fallacy there? Your statement contains the exact same fallacy."

Here's the fallacy in this common sense challenged response. You have to first live in an area where there actually ARE monkeys before you could test your "anti-Monkey rock."

So.....try again.

Submitted by Anonymous on

"To all those posting TSA hating or bashing comments just remember this - you DEMANDED that the government make air travel safer and that another 9/11 type attack NEVER happen again."

I did? Really? What makes you think that? I wanted real security; security that observed Constitutional freedoms. Instead, I got the TSA. How messed up is that?

Submitted by Anonymous on

"TSA officers are not trained to determine if a magazine is functional or not. The federal law states no parts of a firearm are allowed in carry-on bags."

No, Federal law does not state this at all. Care to forward your cite?

"Let me explain this to those who are common sense challeged. Several different passengers could bring on different parts of a handgun and assemble it while in flight."

Could they also assemble, for example, a knife? A bow and arrow? You're cracking me up here.

"And to all those who commented above about the BB gun....in the last 2 weeks TSA stopped 63 real handguns from getting onto planes in passengers bags."

And missed an estimate 200 guns, based on the statistical basis of 30% detection subsequently validated by Congress in the November 2011 report.

"I'm not saying any one of these had plans to hijack a plane, but what if while in flight the passenger with the handgun gets into an altercation with another passenger and decides to pull out the gun and start shooting?? Ever thought about that?"

Oh my! Suspend everyone's Constitutional rights!

"You anti-TSA people need to realize their agency was created because of terrorists hijacking several planes and using them to kill thousands of people. Since TSA was created the score is TSA-10(years) Terrorists-0. Yep, a shut out!"

You sure are smart. I guess the record of the TSA against extraterrestrials is also a shutout, isn't it?

Submitted by Anonymous on

As is always the case, I see nothing in this list that would not have been caught with a simple metal detector and x-ray for baggage and I see absolutely no plot to harm an aircraft or anyone on it.

Submitted by Wintermute on

Anonymous said...
"Here's the fallacy in this common sense challenged response. You have to first live in an area where there actually ARE monkeys before you could test your "anti-Monkey rock."

"So.....try again."

Except monkeys are more common where I live than terrorists, so I stand by my argument.

Pages